Views From the Summit

Home » Blog: Views from the Summit

Contact Info

If you have questions about Ascendian Healthcare Consulting, please contact us directly.

We've Moved!

Office Location

2424 Professional Drive
Roseville, CA 95661

Mailing Address

P.O. Box 1925
Loomis, CA 95650

Telephone & Fax

OFFICE: (916) 797-1441
TOLL FREE: (866) 323-PACS (7227)
FAX: (916) 797-1442

Modernizing Disease Registries

Author -Rupinder Colby

During an opening presentation at the 2013 HIE Stakeholder Summit Dr. Ken Kizer outlined plans to stand up a “Next Generation Disease Registry.” Kizer is Director of the UC Davis Institute for Population Health Management, the organization chosen by the state of California to develop and implement Health Information Exchange (HIE) programs across the state.

The registry project is part of an initiative called INSPIRE (Interoperability to Support Practice Improvement, Disease Registries and Care Coordination). Patients with high impact chronic conditions such as cancer, diabetes, Alzheimer’s and stroke often see providers in multiple care settings. No single provider has access to the patient’s longitudinal medical history. As is commonly known, integrating data from the multiple settings offers an opportunity to drastically improve care and reduce costs. This opportunity lies in near-real-time access and analysis of data allowing the derivation of clinical intelligence from the dataset to effectively manage chronic illness at the individual and population level.

During the Summit, Kizer reminded us that the current registry model utilizes manual extraction from charts. Because there is an underutilization of structured data collection at the point of care, extracted data must undergo cleansing, which in the case of cancer data can take up to 36 months. Two to three year old diagnosis information “undermines the usability and utility of the data, making it essentially of no use to clinical care” said Kizer.

Kizer’s Next Generation Registry envisions EHR-based capture of structured data directly from the point of care transferred through a HIE to populate the registry. The project will begin with providers in the ATHENA Breast Health Network. ATHENA, launched in 2009, gathers breast cancer screening, demographic, lifestyle and other information on women from five UC Medical Centers.

The registry project hopes to demonstrate the use of new HL-7/ASCO cancer specific data standards. The aim is to operationalize the breast cancer registry on an experiential basis as a pilot for implementation on a broader scale. The vision is to move to multiple sources of data and include multiple health conditions creating a single system for data collection and storage that can be leveraged at different ‘nodes’.

A second objective of the INSPIRE initiative is the concept of a ‘Health Information Home.’ This concept recognizes that data submitted to a HIE or a disease registry has clinical relevance. Why not leverage this registry bound data to make it available for population health management (PHM) analytics at the provider level. In place of a separate PHM system, Kizer envisions a ‘room’ within the Health Information Home that providers could access to support chronic illness care. This concept aims to vertically integrate data collection for HIE, disease registries, and PHM.

The challenge remains around the underuse of structured data collection at the point of care. Without structured data the cost and time required to accurately populate a disease registry remain inhibitive. Kizer noted this is a cultural challenge not a technical challenge.

The New Generation Registry and the Health Information Home remain evolving ideas—we look forward to hearing more.

 
 

Who’s Driving CVIS and What’s the Outcome

By Val Kapitula

An interesting paradigm shift is occurring within the healthcare organizations and it was very apparent at this year’s ACC.13 Expo. Some of the feedback from several large Cardiovascular Information System (CVIS) vendors clearly sent that message across. The feedback was simple, “We are going to decrease the size of our booth for ACC.14.” Why is that? At the peak of CVIS market, these vendors are actually considering such drastic changes for ACC.14. The answer lies within the organizational shift that has been evolving over last several years. The decision-making around the procurement of enterprise CVIS, or other enterprise informatics systems, has now shifted to the Information Technology (IT) side of healthcare. More than ever, large Integrated Delivery Network (IDN) IT leadership is seeking to create interoperability standards, consolidate archive solutions, create efficiency around Protected Health Information (PHI) retention and cost, and ultimately, improve the ability to integrate with Healthcare Information Exchange initiatives. Is this a risk for cardiology patient care? Should the cardiologists be more engaged in these critical discoveries and decisions?

ACC has always been a scientific conference and it will most-likely continue as such. Most of the attendees are cardiologists and they are interested in the advances of cardiovascular science. I approached a few cardiologists at the show with a simple question, “Do you currently have a CVIS solution at your facility?” The common answer was a returned with a question, “What do you mean when you say a complete CVIS solution?” The cardiologists simply do not have a full understanding of the available technology on the market and the clinical benefits it introduces. When our CVIS discussion expanded into greater detail, some of the feedback was genuine excitement for the technology, and some of it was reserved due to the lack of interest. Smaller numbers of cardiologists were simply content with their existing workflow and preferred not to introduce new challenges with a system change. Who holds that responsibility to educate today’s cardiologists? I strongly believe that the responsibility lies with the cardiologists and their ACC priorities are simply directed to the science side of patient care.

That being said, where do we go from here? Is it a clinical risk that the cardiologists are now comfortable and rely on their IT leadership to conduct these enterprise system discoveries? Is it actually a risk? The answers will fluctuate depending on the sophistication levels of the healthcare organizations. Today, IT leadership has become one of the most dynamic areas in healthcare and is obligated to understand both technical and clinical benefits of these systems. The primary business drivers for organizations have become the consolidation, retrieval and exchange of enterprise image data in the most feasible and cost effective methods. The clinical aspects have become almost secondary during the discovery; yet, the technological drivers have been known to drastically and naturally improve the patient care following the implementation of these systems.

If ACC is losing its attraction for imaging informatics stakeholders, then which convention is expanding? In this case, the safe assumption is Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS). Majority of CIO, CTO, CMIO and Cardiovascular/Imaging Directors are now focusing their time on these types of conventions for any discovery with image consolidation solutions and strategies for integration with the Electronic Health Record and Healthcare Information Exchange (HIE). Is this paradigm shift changing our healthcare delivery? I believe the true and honest answer can only come from the patient that receives that care.  

 
 

7 Ways to Maintain Patient Interaction in the Age of EHR

A common criticism of EMR (electronic medical records) use in medical practices is that it causes doctors to become less engaged and impersonal. This causes frustration for all parties - patients and physicians - because doctors didn’t sign up for computer duty and patients expect a doctor’s full attention during visits.

Software Advice, an online consultancy for medical software, recently did a survey on how to improve doctor-patient interactions in the EMR era. They listed the top seven tips received on maintaining quality relationships:

1. Position your computer between you and the patient: No brainer here. Face the patient during interactions. Take the time to plan where your equipment will go so that this possible.

2. Invest in mobility: Whether it’s a small rolling desk, small tablets or other lightweight tools, choose equipment that helps you move around. A laptop may cost an extra buck but can be worth the investment.

3. Delegate as much as possible: The objective is to interact with the patient as much as possible. Have staff members enter the medical history, medications, prior procedures, etc. prior to the patient’s visit so you don’t have to during the appointment.

4. Dictate as much as possible:  Talk with the patient while scribes enter the information or use dictation software. These allow you to focus more on the patient.

5. Ignore the computer when you first enter the room: Chat with your patient for a few minute before you start recording information in the digital record.

6. Ask about previous complaints: If the patient information is pre-loaded, look over it  before entering the room. If they have open complaints, ask them about the issues to close them out in the emr. This reaffirms to the patient that you care.

7. Finish the chart in the room:  This can help to answer any other questions that might come up so patients feel like they have been listened to.

EMRs take some getting used to. Once a physician develops a rhythm with the software, every patient interaction becomes easier. Practice makes perfect.

 
   

Medical Imaging System (MIS) Solutions

As Featured in Advance for Imaging & Radiation Oncology Magazine

By Valentin Kapitula, a senior consultant at Ascendian Healthcare Consulting

Many MIS companies offer pre-packaged solutions containing options based on typical organizational models. But, examine all components of a package to make sure they're relevant to your organizational, technical and clinical needs. A single-physician office with computed radiography and an ultrasound unit has different requirements than a large integrated delivery network offering all medical imaging and cardiology service lines.

Read Full Article

 
 

California Transforming Healthcare 2012 HIE Stakeholder Summit’s Legal Session

“We are dealing with the tyranny of the urgent” observed Shawn McKenzie, CEO of Ascendian Healthcare Consulting at the HIE Stakeholder Summit, to describe the seminal work of California’s Office of Health Information Integrity (CalOHII) in defining parameters of data sharing agreements for HIE participants on November 1, 2012. Aaron Seib, founder of 2311, LCC and consultant to Cal-OHII, presented Cal-OHII’s vision and supporting goals during the Legal Sessions. Mr. Seib said that the Privacy and Security Task Force was charged with prioritizing a set of terms that should be in most any participant agreement. The resulting Model Modular Participants Agreement (MMPA) is one of the major vehicles accelerating the transformation of healthcare.

Doctors want to know, “How do I make sure that the patients I’m trying to serve are able to receive informed treatment elsewhere?” and patients are concerned about privacy. The MMPA is a reference tool that speaks to the needs of both parties. According to Lori Hack, CEO of Object Health, the MMPA is a “terrific toolkit.” Ms. Hack stated, “[The MMPA] has everything there you could think of…it may diminish some legal fees. It’s a great way to work through bugs.”

The current MMPA is quiet on variable issues such as governance, fees and charges, proprietary and confidential information, disclaimers, exclusions of warranties, limitations and indemnification. Kate Black, a panelist and Staff Counsel at the Center for Democracy and Technology, addressed a need for the next version of the MMPA to include modularized provisions on baseline protections for patients’ privacy, as well as clarification on privacy laws to educate consumers.

Austin O’Flynn, panelist and Senior Counsel of Dignity Health, cautioned that healthcare providers not substitute the MMPA for legal counsel but that the “MMPA takes the work of IT, Privacy, and Legal from six to eight months to two weeks.”

Using the metaphor of a boat Mr. McKenzie aptly noted, “We have the boat. Now we can configure the sails in order to get this thing moving. [The MMPA] will grow as technology grows but it couldn’t be a better starting point.” Continued crafting of the MMPA will put HIE to work in California.

by Ifetayo Freeman, Ascendian Consultant  

 
   

Page 1 of 4

  • «
  •  Start 
  •  Prev 
  •  1 
  •  2 
  •  3 
  •  4 
  •  Next 
  •  End 
  • »